I think that I had my comments screwed up, which is why none showed up. Perhaps they will work now. Who knows.
Yes…I wanted to reply about your question about the 800px wide on your previous post but your site wouldn’t let me comment. Anyway, I vote yes for 800px wide!
Yes. Though they’re still black on black here in Firefox 1.0.1 which makes for difficult editing…
800pixels is peachy.
Oh, and the picture from 20 Feb 2005 @ 9:31 am http://flipdingo.com/?p=14 is indescribably fabulous.
I think I fixed the black/black issue. Reload the page and hopefully the CSS change will work. Thanks for the compliment.
Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *
Name *
Email *
Website
Comment
You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>
Subscribe to blog posts by emailEnter your email address:
Delivered by FeedBurner
I just posted Self Publishing Update, read it here: http://t.co/6HPFyzo5 2 days ago
#writing sans internet connection? 2x the word count! 2 weeks ago
experiment in #writing... I will now shutter my self from the internet for three hours. A report will follow... 2 weeks ago
View more tweets
Yes…I wanted to reply about your question about the 800px wide on your previous post but your site wouldn’t let me comment. Anyway, I vote yes for 800px wide!
Yes. Though they’re still black on black here in Firefox 1.0.1 which makes for difficult editing…
800pixels is peachy.
Oh, and the picture from 20 Feb 2005 @ 9:31 am http://flipdingo.com/?p=14 is indescribably fabulous.
I think I fixed the black/black issue. Reload the page and hopefully the CSS change will work. Thanks for the compliment.